Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
IDS: Net Ranger vs. RealSecure vs. NFR
From: SiOL CERT <cert () siol net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 19:22:11 +0200
Hi. I have two intrusion detection systems on a trial run, but have to chose the big winner. Both of them have been recommended as the cream of the crop and 'best money can buy', but from the wrong persons. One of them is Cisco's Net Ranger Director, which uses HP OpenView as a GUI (not prefered) and other one is ISS' Real Secure, which is a bit of a pain because I'd need to set a machine on each segment of the network I want to monitor. The third IDS is my personal favorite NFR's Network Flight Recorder (ever since I read the white paper), but I need more informations about all of the mentioned IDS systems (especially cons, pros are more or less known). The network in question is an ISP's public part of the system, which means I need some detection system than can swallow more than 70Mbit traffic on the fly. Thanks in advance, Saso
Current thread:
- IDS: Net Ranger vs. RealSecure vs. NFR SiOL CERT (Jul 05)
- Re: IDS: Net Ranger vs. RealSecure vs. NFR Carric Dooley (Jul 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IDS: Net Ranger vs. RealSecure vs. NFR Vin McLellan (Jul 06)
- Re: IDS: Net Ranger vs. RealSecure vs. NFR Robert Graham (Jul 08)