Re: telnet proxy/gw choices?

[ark () eltex ru]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nuqneH,

Neale Banks <neale () lowendale com au> said :
 
> I need to provide telnet access across a BSDI box which has IP forwarding
> disabled (for various good reasons).  For practical reasons, the proxy
> needs to be transparent.

I don't see why does it need..

>  For security reasons, the proxy needs to listen
> on only one interface.
>
> Is there any real alternative to telnet-gw or plug-gw from the fwtk?

..but there are patches to implement both features. See the FAQ. 

                                     _     _  _  _  _      _  _
 {::} {::} {::}  CU in Hell          _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##)        /Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||]            Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNbXn1KH/mIJW9LeBAQGhzwP9GzGGweU406Oa2KcD/zZwFGVq1YfNJezl
7+XPVK1ARRI80fs5MbC1jAWShl6pjKaiiRONF7WJFR+BAwMcOi45QeEPuWrYbziS
P3VPe1nz37NvBy4rw+pUyvIhekU1PiqzjfiC6iYV/k9zEPE8s9M+81gpA5nlgcon
TOZQLQQ6F6s=
=OXGz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----