Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1
From: "Bruce B. Platt" <bbp () comport com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 13:50:39 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: owner-firewall-wizards () nfr net [mailto:owner-firewall-wizards () nfr net] On Behalf Of jgalvin () cs loyola edu Sent: Sunday, December 20, 1998 3:22 PM To: firewall-wizards () nfr net Subject: Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1
As for me, I thought the Diligence advisory was great. A major problem with most firewall product marketing is the assertion by the producers that their software is easy to use and configure, and works "right-out-of-the-box".
Well, if that advisory was correct, then I am really looking forward to the next advisory concerning the entire operating system NT and all its default settings when it comes out-of-box. Me to! I don't believe Checkpoint advertises Firewall-1 to be out of box. Not to mention the fact that there are lots of links on their site that point to training and resources. I wasn't picking on them, particularly, most of the vendors imply ease of setup and use.
Now, Checkpoint has a "certification" program for training administrators ... which some other vendors don't. But I'm delighted to see anything which raises public awareness about the difficulties of fw configuration, installation, maintenance, and monitoring.
Well, in my opinion, Checkpoint Firewall-1 is one of the easiest solutions to manage, but it certainly does take training to do it. What would really be nice is if "IT professionals" would realize that putting a firewall in front of their entire LAN is not going to be an easy task. If I were to put up a dam somewhere on the Missippi, you'd better believe that it would take more than myself and a few engineering manuals to do it ;-) And, that's what I wanted to emphasize. That the business we have an interest in, firewalls and security is best done with the advice of professionals. Happy Holidays to you, and all on the list! Regards, Bruce Regards, Jenn
Current thread:
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1, (continued)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Randolf-Heiko Skerka (Dec 15)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Darren Reed (Dec 14)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Peter J. Cherny (Dec 15)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Lart (Dec 15)
- RE: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Joe Ippolito (Dec 18)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 mark s. kassem (Dec 12)
- RE: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Houser David DW (Dec 14)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Ryan Russell (Dec 14)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Bruce B. Platt (Dec 18)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 jgalvin (Dec 22)
- RE: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Bruce B. Platt (Dec 24)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 jgalvin (Dec 22)
- RE: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 jgalvin (Dec 24)
- RE: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Scot Anderson (Dec 26)
- Re: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Neil Buckley (Dec 28)
- RE: Ports 256,257,258 open on FW-1 Moser, Stefan (Dec 29)