Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Small code (was Re: chroot useful?)

From: chuck yerkes <Chuck () yerkes com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 14:59:13 -0500 (EST)

It is claimed, but unverified, that Colin Campbell wrote:
[...]

Absolutely.  I think most people would agree that the smaller the code, the better.


Consider WatchGuard. No hard drive, proxies of sorts and SPF and it all fits
on a boot floppy in under 500KB.


Sure, send me the source :)

500K is PLENTY of space for bad code...

Current thread:

Re: chroot useful?, (continued)
- Re: chroot useful? Anton J Aylward (Nov 17)
- RE: chroot useful? Joseph Judge (Nov 17)
- Re: chroot useful? Paul McNabb (Nov 17)
- Re: chroot useful? Paul McNabb (Nov 17)
  - Re: chroot useful? C. Harald Koch (Nov 20)
- Re: chroot useful? Anton J Aylward (Nov 20)
  - Re: chroot useful? chuck yerkes (Nov 21)
    - Re: chroot useful? Adam Shostack (Nov 21)
- Re: chroot useful? Paul McNabb (Nov 20)
  - Re: chroot useful? Colin Campbell (Nov 21)
    - Small code (was Re: chroot useful?) chuck yerkes (Nov 23)
- Re: chroot useful? Anton J Aylward (Nov 21)