Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: Advanced Email Security Solutions


From: "Baillio, Aaron" <abaillio () OU EDU>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:49:58 +0000

For the most part they are providing educational pricing.  For all of them, we're paying full price for faculty/staff 
and then they each have their own way of devising what the student cost will be.  But I will say the variance has been 
$100k+ across those vendors.

Aaron

From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Burns, 
Patrick
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 12:34 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Advanced Email Security Solutions

Hi Aaron

We are on Office 365 as well.  Are the vendors in this space providing 'educational' pricing (e.g. FTE) or per mailbox? 
 With all the mailboxes we have, most seldom used, it could be a pretty expensive proposition for us.

Thanks
Patrick

----------------------------------------
Patrick Burns
CIO - Yavapai College
928.776.2055 (O)
928.237.0944 (M)
patrick.burns () yc edu<mailto:patrick.burns () yc edu>
'Yavapai College - life explored'
----------------------------------------

From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Baillio, 
Aaron
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 6:47 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Advanced Email Security Solutions

Thank you for posing this question as it is timely and relevant to us as well!

We've been looking at the same thing for several months though we haven't actually undergone a proof of concept with 
any vendors yet.  We are also O365 users.

We are considering:

1.       MS ATP

2.       Mimecast

3.       Proofpoint

4.       Cisco CES

5.       FireEye MX protection

Based on features, effectiveness and cost I am leaning toward Mimecast.  Proofpoint is great but will be so much more 
expensive I've pretty much ruled them out.  Same with Cisco.

All of them do the key requirements which are sandboxing, URL rewrites and additional spam and av protection.  To me, 
the deciding factors then come down to the effectiveness of the sandbox and any other additional features to cost ratio.

I'd love to hear experience or thoughts on any of these products.

B. Aaron Baillio, Sec+, CEH, CISSP
University of Oklahoma, Information Technology
Managing Director, Security Operations and Architecture
O: 405-325-7948
C: 254-400-6404



From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Sue 
Rivera
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 5:00 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>
Subject: [SECURITY] Advanced Email Security Solutions

Hello Security Constituents
We're looking to implement an Advanced Email Security Solution to integrate with Office 365 at our University.

If you have some time, do you mind telling us about any solutions you have employed to battle with spam, phishing, 
malicious attachments and malicious URL's in your Office 365 environment as well as any successes and challenges since 
implementation?

Thank you for taking your time to respond!

Have a breach free day!

Thank you,
Sue Rivera
Information Security Analyst
Information Technology Services
California State University, Bakersfield
https://www.csub.edu/its
https://twitter.com/itscsub
661-654-2408
srivera () csub edu<mailto:srivera () csub edu>







Current thread: