Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Blocking p2p traffic
From: Leo Song <song () UOGUELPH CA>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:57:33 -0400
David. How many responses you received which mentioned " Add more bandwidth instead of trying to block"? That will be very helpful. thanks. Leo Song Senior Analyst, Network and Security Computing and Communications Services (CCS) 519-824-4120 Ext53181 song () uoguelph ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room008, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Curry" <david.curry () NEWSCHOOL EDU> To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 2:23:39 PM Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Blocking p2p traffic I did promise a summary once the responses died down, so here it is. The following solutions were mentioned: • Add more bandwidth instead of trying to block • Procera • NetEqualizer • Exinda • TippingPoint IPS • SourceFire IPS • Fortinet • Cisco SCE Exinda was mentioned by two people; all the others were mentioned by one person each. Everybody seems to be generally happy with their solutions; Procera and NetEqualizer received perhaps somewhat more enthusiastic "likes" than the others, but that's my subjective reaction. Thanks to all who responded. --Dave -- DAVID A. CURRY, CISSP • DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION SECURITY THE NEW SCHOOL • 55 W. 13TH STREET • NEW YORK, NY 10011 +1 212 229-5300 x4728 • david.curry () newschool edu On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:31 PM, David Curry < david.curry () newschool edu > wrote: We currently have an aging Packeteer whose sole remaining purpose in life is to "shape" peer-to-peer file sharing traffic (BitTorrent and friends) down to zero, thus keeping us from receiving DMCA takedown requests. It's worked well at this for several years, but now we're starting to max it out as far as licensed bandwidth goes, and we're not inclined to spend more money on such an old device. So... we're in the market for something new, and thought we'd ask what other schools are using. From a bit of research it looks like Procera and Exinda are still in that space; A10 has a product on their website still, but it doesn't look like there's much focus on it anymore (maybe we're wrong). Juniper SRX firewalls (which we own) have some capabilities in this space via their AppID stuff; we'd be interested in hearing from anyone using them for that purpose. And yes, we know that Palo Alto firewalls can do it -- but we don't have Palo Altos and have no plans to purchase them anytime soon, so that's not really an option for us. If you're using something OTHER THAN a Palo Alto firewall to block/limit/reduce peer-to-peer traffic: • What product are you using? • What are you doing with peer-to-peer (blocking, limiting, etc.) • How well is it working? • Do you like it? After responses taper off, I'll summarize back to the list. Thanks, --Dave -- DAVID A. CURRY, CISSP • DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION SECURITY THE NEW SCHOOL • 55 W. 13TH STREET • NEW YORK, NY 10011 +1 212 229-5300 x4728 • david.curry () newschool edu
Current thread:
- Blocking p2p traffic David Curry (May 02)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Russ Leathe (May 02)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Coffman, Tobiah (May 03)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic David Curry (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Santabarbara, Angelo (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic John Ladwig (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Miller,James R (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Leo Song (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic David Curry (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Santabarbara, Angelo (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Robert Lau (May 03)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Russ Leathe (May 02)