Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper
From: Adam Garside <Adam.Garside () CPCC EDU>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:33:00 -0500
Tcpwrappers requires an application be compiled to support it. iptables acts at the kernel level and is application independent. Nothing wrong in using both though. Adam -- Adam Garside Director of Network Services Information Security Officer Central Piedmont Community College ----- Original Message ----- From:"Griese, Steven A." <sagriese () PURDUE EDU> To:"SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU" <SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU> Sent:3/3/2010 4:29 PM Subject:[SECURITY] IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper IPtables are new to me and I just wanted a knowledgeable opinion whether it is thought of as good an access control device (Tcp_wrapper) or that one far outweighs the other. Does anyone have a quick opinion on the topic? Steve Griese
Current thread:
- IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Griese, Steven A. (Mar 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Adam Garside (Mar 03)
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Josh Richard (Mar 03)
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Kevin Wilcox (Mar 03)
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Josh Richard (Mar 03)
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Adam Garside (Mar 03)
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Kevin Wilcox (Mar 04)
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Valdis Kletnieks (Mar 04)
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Josh Richard (Mar 04)
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Valdis Kletnieks (Mar 04)
- Re: IPtables versus Tcp_wrapper Josh Richard (Mar 04)