Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform


From: Paul Keser <pkeser () STANFORD EDU>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:42:34 -0700

Eric-

I would love a copy of your methodology and your findings.

-PaulK

Paul Keser
Assoc. Information Security Officer
Stanford University
650.724.9051
GPG Fingerprint:  DBA3 E20F CE91 28AA DA1C  4A77 3BD9 C82D 2699 24FB

Erik Decker wrote:


Howdy!


Loyola University Chicago recently went through an involved RFP and
evaluation process on SIEM.  We looked at 4 competitors:  RSA, Novell,
NitroSecurity and QRadar.  In the end, NitroSecurity won.  In fact, the
boxes just shipped to us yesterday.


It was certainly not an easy choice.  All of the vendors had their own
'spin' on SIEM that was impressive.  In the end, however, NItroSecurity
won Loyola's business based on the following criteria:  Upfront cost,
long term cost (the won here hands down), functionality, overhead,
management, product development and vendor relations.


My analysis went over a span of several months.  It included scoring RFP
responses, vendor meetings, cost negotiations, training negotiations,
enterprise architecture, technical resource 'draw' and "fit" for the
culture.  It's hard to say that on SIEM is better than any other.  I can
say, however, that I was in the exact same comparison between RSA and
Nitro and struggled with the same choice.  They are both very good
products, and I would be proud to maintain either of them.  However, due
to the size of Loyola and the deployment plan for an enterprise
installation, RSA was extremely expensive.


I will put in one other plug about NitroSecurity - everyone in their
organization, including their leadership, is very involved with their
customers.  That means a lot to us.  At one point during our product
demo we had the CEO, VP of Sales and VP of Engineering on the phone.  We
didn't get that kind of attention from RSA. :)


Hope that helps!  Again, if you would like to see our methodology I
could throw it out to you off-list.  I'm pretty proud of it.


Thanks,





----

Erik Decker

Security Administrator

Information Technology Services

 >>> Anand S Malwade <Anand.Malwade () SHU EDU> 07/24/09 10:26 AM >>>


Hi,


Curious to know if other Universities have deployed or compared RSA
Envision to Nitro or other SIEM solutions.


Thanks,


Anand





Anand Malwade,


Information Security Officer,


Seton Hall University,


Anand.Malwade () shu edu


973 275 2209











From:

The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] *On Behalf Of *Dexter Caldwell
*Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2009 11:23 AM
*To:* SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
*Subject:* Re: [SECURITY] NitroSecurity SIEM platform




Hi Charles,


        We use the NitroSecurity SIEM. We recently purchased and have
been using it for a few short months now.   I had the same impression as
you did from the demo and after a vigorous eval we decided it was the
best system for our needs.  Those needs centered around the
following:  analysis capabilities, 3rd party platform logging support,
scalabillity, performance, technical support, storage, short-term value
($$$) and long-term dollar cost, management overhead, and possible
integration with other tools we have or might be looking to in the
future .  We evaluated a few other products all of which had their
strenghths, weaknesses, but NitroSecurity came out on top for us.  If
you'd like details I feel free to contact me off-list.




Thanks,




Dexter Caldwell


Information Security Administrator


Computing & Information Services


Furman University


3300 Poinsett Hwy


Greenville, SC 29613


email: dexter.caldwell () furman edu <mailto:dexter.caldwell () furman edu>


office: 864-294-3566


facsimile: 864-294.3001




The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv
<SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU <mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>>
writes:


Does anyone on this list use the NitroSecurity SIEM platform who would
care to share their experiences? We saw a demo of it yesterday, and to
say the least, I was impressed. It appears to be far beyond what our
current solution is capable of in terms of speed and functionality, but
of course the proof is in the pudding, so to speak.




Thanks,




Charlie


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Charles A. Seitz


Senior Security Analyst


University of Tennessee Information Security Office


Martin Campus


cseitz () tennessee edu


(731) 881-7966





Current thread: