Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Replacing Bluesocket with Cisco NAC (formerly known as Clean Access)
From: "Aaron S. Thompson" <athompson () BERKLEE EDU>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:35:18 -0400
We have a hybrid OOB wireless deployment using 802.1x with mainly Cisco 1130ag's in autonomous mode. Authentication is handle with FreeRadius to OpenLDAP. We supplement our design with PacketFence for sponsored access and a public offering. PacketFence also works with Radius for LDAP authentication for our sponsored process. Let me know if you would like any additional information on how we use any of the above. Regards, - Aaron Thompson Network Analyst Network and Telecommunications Berklee College of Music 1140 Boylston Street, MS-186 NETT Boston, MA 02215-3693 617.747.8656 athompson () berklee edu www.berklee.edu On Jul 24, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Kevin Fitzgerald wrote:
Hello all, We are currently in the process of replacing our Bluesocket Secured Controller appliances with Cisco's NAC. The Bluesockets are only used for LDAP auth (user login). In our environment we will be doing wireless and wired out-of-band (OOB) in virtual gateway mode, and our NAC is centrally deployed. Our wireless access points operate in lightweight mode using Cisco Wireless Lan Controllers. All of our WAPS are Cisco 1231 (LWAPP) running off of Cisco WLCs. We are moving to a Cisco end-to-end solution composed of the NAC, WLCs, and WAPs. I'd love to hear from some folks who have already gone down this road. The documentation that I've read often refers to RADIUS accounting records. Has anyone implemented a wireless OOB solution with LDAP? Kindest regards, K. Fitzgerald Computing Services Networks University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Replacing Bluesocket with Cisco NAC (formerly known as Clean Access) Kevin Fitzgerald (Jul 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Replacing Bluesocket with Cisco NAC (formerly known as Clean Access) Aaron S. Thompson (Jul 24)