Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: New Internet for Security
From: Leo Song <song () UOGUELPH CA>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:40:44 -0500
It does not touch the root, the idea of starting it over again itself is quite irresponsible and ridiculous. WE, people, is the problem, I would like see how we can start to act to influence Internet, rather than trying to fix it, take a look at the economical crisis, environmental issues, are we really "fixing" them? Leo Song, Cluster Lead - Networking and Security (519) 824-4120 x 53181 CCS, University of Guelph ----- Original Message ----- From: "Theresa Rowe" <rowe () OAKLAND EDU> To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:46:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [SECURITY] New Internet for Security http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/weekinreview/15markoff.html?th&emc=th Do We Need a New Internet? "Bad enough that there is a growing belief among engineers and security experts that Internet security and privacy have become so maddeningly elusive that the only way to fix the problem is to start over." Do you think it is really that bad? -- Theresa Rowe Chief Information Officer Oakland University
Current thread:
- New Internet for Security Theresa Rowe (Feb 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New Internet for Security Marty Manjak (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet for Security Gene Spafford (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet for Security Tracy Mitrano (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet for Security David Shettler (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet for Security Jeffrey I. Schiller (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet for Security John Bambenek (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet for Security Leo Song (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet for Security Dennis Meharchand (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet for Security Kevin Shalla (Feb 16)
- Re: New Internet for Security Hugh Burley (Feb 16)
- Re: New Internet for Security Keith Schoenefeld (Feb 16)
- Re: New Internet for Security Valdis Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: New Internet for Security Valdis Kletnieks (Feb 17)