Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management
From: Cal Frye <cjf () CALFRYE COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:41:37 -0400
Babb, Robert wrote:
We just switched from a Packetshaper 6500 to Procera Packetlogic and have been very happy with it.
I'll second the comments on the PacketLogic. It can do the NetEQ /or/ the Packetshaper approach, the management interface is responsive, and there are interesting upper-layer firewall possibilities, too. -- Regards, -- Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College www.calfrye.com, www.pitalabs.com "Just think of the tragedy of teaching children not to doubt." -- Clarence Darrow.
Current thread:
- Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Rafael Cortes (Apr 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Charlie Prothero (Apr 17)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Julian Y. Koh (Apr 17)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Jenkins, Matthew (Apr 17)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management David Lundy (Apr 17)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Russ Leathe (Apr 18)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Jeff Kell (Apr 18)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Bradley, Stephen W. Mr. (Apr 18)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Vanderbilt, Teresa (Apr 18)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Babb, Robert (Apr 18)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Cal Frye (Apr 18)
- Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management Lutzen, Karl F. (Apr 18)