Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Proofpoint vs. Ironport
From: Brian Epstein <bepstein () IAS EDU>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:28:55 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/14/2008 05:55 PM, Holland II, Richard H wrote: | I was curious if anyone would mind sharing their experiences with either of | these products. (especially if you have done a bake off between then). I have 0 experience with Ironport. I have acted in the role of a VAR for Proofpoint many moons ago and we are currently using them in our production environment (although the solution was chosen before I arrived here). I may sound biased due to my history with Proofpoint, but I have been very impressed with their technology and the results are great. I have worked on a very technical level with their support staff and have always been met with knowledgeable help. They integrate with a few different anti-virus vendors and run either in an appliance mode or as software on your server. Thanks, Brian - -- Brian Epstein <bepstein () ias edu> +1 609-734-8179 Network and Security Officer Institute for Advanced Study Key fingerprint = 128A 38F4 4CFA 5EDB 99CE 4734 6117 4C25 0371 C12A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIBJ+HYRdMJQNxwSoRAv8/AKC1ChBN5MSp72iv9K4bqFv4x6wHzACgsuqp te7XWUv7w7coEdHY/D8pdH4= =e9vz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Proofpoint vs. Ironport Holland II, Richard H (Apr 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Proofpoint vs. Ironport Brian Epstein (Apr 15)
- Re: Proofpoint vs. Ironport Ashley Frost (Apr 15)