Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: POP vs IMAP policy
From: Paul Russell <prussell () ND EDU>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:11:13 -0400
On 4/20/2007 17:55, David Lundy wrote:
We are proposing eliminating POP in favor of IMAP using encrypted connections
> only for faculty and staff who access email in this fashion. Our reasoning is > that POP is based on the model of downloading the email to the client whereas > IMAP is primarily server based. Server resident email better prepares us for > handling document retention and E-Discovery.
Has anyone addressed this issue? What arguments did you make? What policies
> do you have? Were E-Discovery or document retention issues addressed?
I do not understand how the elimination of POP will facilitate implementation of a message retention strategy. How will you prevent users from copying messages from their IMAP mailbox to local storage, then deleting the messages from their IMAP mailbox? How will you ensure that sent messages are stored in an appropriate folder in the user's IMAP mailbox, rather than on the user's workstation? -- Paul Russell, Senior Systems Administrator OIT Messaging Services Team University of Notre Dame prussell () nd edu
Current thread:
- POP vs IMAP policy David Lundy (Apr 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: POP vs IMAP policy Paul Russell (Apr 20)
- Re: POP vs IMAP policy Kevin Shalla (Apr 23)