Re: TJX breach shows that encryption can be foiled

["Adrian Sanabria" <adrian.sanabria () gmail com>]

So frustrating, getting little bits of technical info at a time. It is even
common for people to refer to something password protected as "encrypted".
Just the phrase "decryption tool" is a big clue. Clue to what, I don't know,
but most encryption I've worked with would never lead me to use that phrase.
Can anyone think of a specific product that would refer to? The only thing I
can think of is the decryption tool (usually put on a bootable floppy or cd)
Helpdesk and Security use to decrypt most enterprise full disk encryption.

--Sawaba

On 4/2/07, Chris Walsh <cwalsh () cwalsh org> wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Casey, Troy # Atlanta wrote:
>
> > It should make for a short list of suspects, assuming TJX was doing a
> > reasonable job of key management...
>
> That (reasonable key management) is a critical assumption.
>
> I'd be interested in learning what algorithm (and implementation
> thereof) they were using, as well.
>
> Not holding my breath on that info :^)
>
> cw
> _______________________________________________
> Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () attrition org)
> http://attrition.org/dataloss
> Tracking more than 203 million compromised records in 609 incidents over 7
> years.
_______________________________________________
Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () attrition org)
http://attrition.org/dataloss
Tracking more than 203 million compromised records in 609 incidents over 7 years.