BreachExchange mailing list archives
Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union
From: Adam Shostack <adam () homeport org>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:12:15 -0400
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:09:50PM -0400, lyger wrote: | | | On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Adam Shostack wrote: | | ": " Can I suggest you use a longer identifier, or are you planning to give | ": " up after the first 10,000 breaches? | ": " | ": " | ": " On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:25:24PM -0500, Chris Walsh wrote: | ": " | This one is another from the state of North Carolina's response to my | ": " | FOIA request. | ": " | | ": " | I am assigning it a UID of "CW-0006". | | We actually discussed this at length over several emails. As it stands, | we still have well under 400 breaches listed in DLDOS. Even at a rate of | one per day from this point forward, that would be another 26 years or so | until we cross into the 5-digit realm. | | At that point, our future generations will probably be able to figure out | how to switch out the existing identifier in mere nanoseconds. :) There's *no way* this system will still be operational by the year 2000. And memory is sooo expensive! More seriously, 1) I expect the rate to climb substantially as companies realize that breaches happen and 2) the year bits in CVE are really useful. Adam _______________________________________________ Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () attrition org) http://attrition.org/dataloss Tracking more than 146 million compromised records in 349 incidents over 6 years.
Current thread:
- Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union Chris Walsh (Sep 15)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union Adam Shostack (Sep 16)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union lyger (Sep 16)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union Adam Shostack (Sep 16)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union lyger (Sep 16)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union Adam Shostack (Sep 16)