Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Security Paleontology - The Jurassic Park rule
From: William Arbaugh <warbaugh () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:11:02 -0400
On Jul 17, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Dave Aitel <dave () immunityinc com> wrote:
I got a bunch of replies that said this: """ Dave, enjoyed reading your rant, but I don't understand your punchline on securing data --"but in fact, just to make it less valuable" - how do you do make data less valuable? """
Ultimately, we're suffering from the sins of the early days of information assurance. The focus then, as now, was on protecting the computers and networks. Instead, the focus should have been on protecting the data. It's a huge paradigm shift, and one that won't happen easily if at all. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunityinc com https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Security Paleontology - The Jurassic Park rule Dave Aitel (Jul 16)
- Re: Security Paleontology - The Jurassic Park rule Dave Aitel (Jul 17)
- Re: Security Paleontology - The Jurassic Park rule William Arbaugh (Jul 17)
- Re: Security Paleontology - The Jurassic Park rule Dennis Groves (Jul 18)
- Re: Security Paleontology - The Jurassic Park rule Wolfgang Kandek (Jul 17)
- Re: Security Paleontology - The Jurassic Park rule Rafal ( Wh1t3Rabbit) Los (Jul 18)
- Re: Security Paleontology - The Jurassic Park rule William Arbaugh (Jul 17)
- Re: Security Paleontology - The Jurassic Park rule Dave Aitel (Jul 17)