Re: Trojan Languages

[Andrew <munin () mimisbrunnr net>]

pnacl (though an impressive technology that I love a lot) doesn't answer
this question either - its supported target list (x86, arm, mips) is a
subset of the targets supported by LLVM (which supports many more). And
there is still work you have to do (as a programmer writing code that is
trying to be native) to support differing endian-ness (from source to
host) or data encoding.
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-October/043686.html,
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/native-client-discuss/h6GJ8nQd23E)

On 11/30/13 07:24, PaX Team wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2013 at 11:29, Andrew wrote:
>
> > Ultimately, your question of "why isn't this done more" can be answered
> > succinctly by 
>
> http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/pnacl/introduction-to-portable-native-client
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunityinc com
https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave