Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked!
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:54:05 +0100
* Halvar Flake:
Also, hash functions are very much tailored to the CPUs they run on (hence the proliferation of add/xor/rol constructs in the SHA-3 contest) -- building a hash function optimized for the JVM would probably use different building blocks.
The fact that C hasn't got a rotate-left operator did not deter the submitters from using it. 8-) Things that are difficult to do efficiently on the JVM, like unsigned 32 x 32 -> 64 multiplication, are not very interesting for general-purpose implementations, either. I'm not sure if hashing for the JVM would look *that* much different. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked!, (continued)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Dave Aitel (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! David Molnar (Feb 25)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! romain (Feb 28)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Dave Aitel (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! silky (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Tal Garfinkel (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Alexander Sotirov (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Chris Eng (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! romain (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Michal Zalewski (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Tal Garfinkel (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Adam Shostack (Feb 24)