Re: Attacking Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology

["val smith" <valsmith () attackresearch com>]

Heh, thats a good point. I'll tell you what, (not that I ever speak
about anything so interesting or controversial as most of you) but if
there's no imminent lawsuit, I'll post all the details about whatever
talk I'm going to give on my website before whatever conference. Then
hopefully even though you'll know what I'm going to say, you'll still
come see me for my good looks at least :)

V.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, RB <aoz.syn () gmail com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 02:34, Joanna Rutkowska
> <joanna () invisiblethingslab com> wrote:
> > The meat is in DC, the very next month. As it is customary these days, you're
> > free to speculate on how each stage of the attacks might work, but, of course,
> > we won't provide any comments on this until our BH presentation.
>
> Thisjustin: Do current security theater^Wresearch practices involve
> nearly as much PR as actual work?  Have previously meaningful
> discussion lists devolved to simple broadcast media for the profiteer?
>  Find out at my next $1200/head media circus!
> _______________________________________________
> Dailydave mailing list
> Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
> http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave