Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a "lessons learned"
From: "Kyle Maxwell" <krmaxwell () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:07:15 -0700
On 5/24/06, Martin Johns <martin.johns () gmail com> wrote:
I do not think monitored outbound proxies are a feasible concept to prevent the leakage of classified material. As long as http traffic is allowed, there are about 100000000 hidden channels which could be used to encode the material.
Why are networks hosting classified material able to reach the public network? Isn't that a better question? -- Kyle Maxwell http://caffeinatedsecurity.com [krmaxwell () gmail com]
Current thread:
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a "lessons learned", (continued)
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a "lessons learned" Joanna Rutkowska (May 24)
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a "lessons learned" val smith (May 24)
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a "lessons learned" Nicolas RUFF (May 25)
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a "lessons learned" mark (May 25)
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a "lessons learned" Martin Johns (May 24)
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a "lessons learned" Etaoin Shrdlu (May 24)
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a "lessons learned" Andrew Simmons (May 24)
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a"lessons learned" Halvar Flake (May 24)
- Re: We got owned by the Chinese and didn't even get a"lessons learned" Etaoin Shrdlu (May 24)
- air gap vs. covert channels (was: We got owned by the Chinese...) Joanna Rutkowska (May 24)