Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Commercial Fuzzers
From: Dave Aitel <dave () immunityinc com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:35:23 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 RaMatkal wrote:
Just wandering if anyone on this list has had any experience with a commercial fuzzer such as beStorm (http://www.beyondsecurity.com/BeStorm_Info.htm) and how it/they compare to open source equivalents such as SPIKE.... RaMatkal
I think we all over the last week have gotten a bit of experience with the ProtoVer fuzzer, which is probably a lot cheaper the the commercial Protos, but clearly produces results. :> I like how there's at least one mailing list left that allows a flood of 0day... - -dave -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD8zwrB8JNm+PA+iURAjSRAKCvxK6K/jH/TdBgocHljMOM3TNJxQCePkLT 6egNI/FyUlKARGF6nEaJa2Q= =rr0g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability Evgeny Legerov (Jan 31)
- Re: Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability KF (lists) (Jan 31)
- Re: Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability Evgeny Legerov (Jan 31)
- Re: Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability Dave Aitel (Feb 01)
- Commercial Fuzzers RaMatkal (Feb 15)
- Re: Commercial Fuzzers Dave Aitel (Feb 15)
- Re: Commercial Fuzzers Matt Hargett (Feb 15)
- Re: Commercial Fuzzers Gadi Evron (Feb 15)
- Re: Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability Evgeny Legerov (Jan 31)
- Re: Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability KF (lists) (Jan 31)