Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six?
From: Dave Aitel <dave () immunitysec com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:38:22 -0500
What you really want is a Python implementation of MSRPC, strongly audited, but instead, you could perhaps use one of the newer MS compilers to generate .Net managed C code, right?
-dave halvar () gmx de wrote:
Hey all,I really want to inject Ethereal into every process as a network shim, and have it throw away any packets it doesn't know how to parse. I think that'd be a neat tool for stopping this sort of thing.Just what we need: In order to deal with faulty parsers, throw more parsers into the address space. Way to go ! :-) Cheers, Halvar
Current thread:
- MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Dave Aitel (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Nicolas RUFF (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Dave Aitel (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Alexander Sotirov (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? H D Moore (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Dave Aitel (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Dave Aitel (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Nicolas RUFF (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Dave Aitel (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Dave Aitel (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Thomas Lakofski (Nov 20)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? H D Moore (Nov 17)
- Re: MSRPC vulnerability 1 billion and six? Dave Aitel (Nov 17)