Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Ants, trees, etc.
From: plonky <plonky () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:06:44 +0200
On 6/23/05, Jonatan B <onatan () gmail com> wrote:
On 6/22/05, David Klotz <bucky () speakeasy org> wrote:The halting problem essentially says you can't write a general program which will verify whether ALL programs will halt or not (when using a computer with infinite memory by the way). While not an expert on this, I suspect you could also use it to formally prove you can't write a general algorithm that determines if ANY two programs behave the same on ALL input.
Well, may be what is following can be pure shit, but in fact i would like to talk about the curry-howards isomorphism ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry-Howard_isomorphism) But two programs which behave exactly the _same_ should have the same proof. but as we talk about isomorphism its not possible to have A!=B and proof(A) = proof(b) (i repeat: in my humble opinion) But i think what we are talking about here is far from this. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Ants, trees, etc. Dave Aitel (Jun 21)
- Re: Ants, trees, etc. Jonatan B (Jun 22)
- Re: Ants, trees, etc. Dave Aitel (Jun 22)
- Re: Ants, trees, etc. dvorak (Jun 22)
- Re: Ants, trees, etc. David Klotz (Jun 22)
- Re: Ants, trees, etc. Jonatan B (Jun 23)
- Re: Ants, trees, etc. plonky (Jun 23)
- Re: Ants, trees, etc. plonky (Jun 23)
- Re: Ants, trees, etc. Jonatan B (Jun 22)