Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Custom defense
From: David Maynor <dmaynor () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:48:57 -0400
I dunno Dave....I am gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you on this one. If you believe in custom attacks then you are not a fan of the hype of companies like ISS. You see, ISS writes their sigs for the vulns, and not for exploits. People like Tipping Point claim this, but in fact don't. Further proof your custom attack market is not very large is the HIPS market. Lack of code coverage and poor design will keep players like Cisco and Entercept from ever stopping anything of any worth. What does this mean, why am I spouting it? Simple, its still the wild, wild, west. Custom attacks, generic attacks, they are all still owning everybody with out protection of REAL security companies********************** On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:02:48 -0400, Dave Aitel <dave () immunitysec com> wrote:
So I think the real market for future security is in custom attacks and defenses. This is what I see people starting to work on, although they call it by many names (IPS, etc).
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Custom defense Dave Aitel (Aug 23)
- Re: Custom defense David Maynor (Aug 23)
- Re: Custom defense Dave Aitel (Aug 23)
- RE: Custom defense Mike Bailey (Aug 23)
- Re: Custom defense Andrew R. Reiter (Aug 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Custom defense Kohlenberg, Toby (Aug 23)
- RE: Custom defense info (Aug 24)
- RE: Custom defense Ron Gula (Aug 24)
- Re: Custom defense David Maynor (Aug 23)