nanog: by thread

nanog: by thread

Previous period

143 messages starting May 02 24 and ending May 18 24
Date index | Thread index | Author index

Sneak Peek of NANOG 91 + MORE Nanog News (May 02)
fubo.tv NOC contact Adair Winter (May 03)
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account (May 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account (May 10)
- Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account (May 17)
Fwd: [MNNOG] mnNOG 6: Call For Presentations bayar batjargal (May 07)
Frontier fiber outage in Tampa Bay? David Hubbard (May 07)
- RE: Frontier fiber outage in Tampa Bay? Greg Dickinson (May 07)
Spoofer Report for NANOG for Apr 2024 CAIDA Spoofer Project (May 08)
Roku Streaming Issues Corey Smith via NANOG (May 08)
- RE: Roku Streaming Issues John Stitt (May 08)
Re: Steve Bellovin retires Patrick Gilmore (May 09)
Apply Now for an ARIN Community Grant John Sweeting (May 09)
Spectrum residential IPv6 issues - contact off-list ? vom513 (May 09)
- Re: Spectrum residential IPv6 issues - contact off-list ? J. Hellenthal via NANOG (May 09)
  - Re: Spectrum residential IPv6 issues - contact off-list ? vom513 (May 09)
NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch John Curran (May 10)
- Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Randy Bush (May 10)
- Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Mel Beckman (May 10)
  - Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Jay R. Ashworth (May 10)
  - Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Raymond Burkholder (May 10)
    - Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Mel Beckman (May 10)
Alien Waves Mike Hammett (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
  - Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
    - Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
    - Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Alien Waves Mike Hammett (May 12)
    - Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
    - Re: Alien Waves Brandon Martin (May 12)
    - Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
    - Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
- Re: Alien Waves eric c (May 13)
Re: Whitebox Routers Beyond the Datasheet Mike Hammett (May 12)
Re: VDSL >2 Pair Bonding Modems Mike Hammett (May 12)
[Event] Call for Presentations EPF 2024, Vienna, Austria // NANOG Arnold Nipper via NANOG (May 13)
Small Internet border router options? Tom Samplonius (May 13)
- RE: Small Internet border router options? Tony Wicks (May 13)
  - Re: Small Internet border router options? Christopher Hawker (May 14)
- Re: Small Internet border router options? Jean Franco (May 13)
  - Re: Small Internet border router options? Harlan Stenn via NANOG (May 13)
    - Re: Small Internet border router options? Mel Beckman (May 13)
    - Re: Small Internet border router options? Heasley (May 13)
- Re: Small Internet border router options? Pim van Pelt via NANOG (May 13)
- Re: Small Internet border router options? Rubens Kuhl (May 14)
  - Re: Small Internet border router options? Brandon Martin (May 15)
- Re: Small Internet border router options? Richard Holbo (May 14)
TIMELY - FINAL REMINDER - ARIN Email Template Retirement Scheduled for 3 June 2024 John Curran (May 13)
On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 John Kristoff (May 13)
- Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 borg (May 14)
  - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 John Kristoff (May 14)
    - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 borg (May 14)
    - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 John Kristoff (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (May 14)
  - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Tom Beecher (May 14)
    - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 borg (May 14)
    - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Warren Kumari (May 14)
GOV zone operational update: DNSSEC transition to algorithm 13 Christian Elmerot (May 13)
NANOG 91: Keynote & Conference Kit Announcement 📢 + More Nanog News (May 14)
Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Adam Thompson (May 14)
- Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Mel Beckman (May 14)
  - RE: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Adam Thompson (May 14)
  - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? William Herrin (May 15)
  - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Nicolas VUILLERMET (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Adam Thompson (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Michel Blais (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Randy Bush (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? William Herrin (May 15)
  - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Jay Acuna (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Mel Beckman (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? William Herrin (May 16)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Mel Beckman (May 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Willy Manga (May 15)
- Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Willy Manga (May 15)
FCC proposes Internet Routing Security Reporting Requirements Job Snijders via NANOG (May 15)
- Re: FCC proposes Internet Routing Security Reporting Requirements Job Snijders via NANOG (May 16)
Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Mel Beckman (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Bjørn Mork (May 15)
  - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Peter Potvin via NANOG (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John Levine (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure William Herrin (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Karl Auer (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Hank Nussbacher (May 16)
    - Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Karl Auer (May 17)
Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Sean Donelan (May 16)
- Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Brandon Zhi (May 16)
  - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Josh Luthman (May 16)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Job Snijders via NANOG (May 16)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Josh Luthman (May 16)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Mike Hammett (May 17)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Tom Beecher (May 17)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Sean Donelan (May 17)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Brandon Martin (May 16)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Job Snijders via NANOG (May 16)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Michael Thomas (May 16)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities John Levine (May 16)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Michael Thomas (May 16)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Sean Donelan (May 17)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Ca By (May 17)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Tom Beecher (May 17)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Ca By (May 17)
    - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Tom Beecher (May 17)
    - RE: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Jason Baugher (May 18)
    - RE: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Jason Baugher (May 18)
  - Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Mark Tinka (May 16)
Meet NANOG's New Executive Director! N91 Agenda is LIVE! + More Nanog News (May 16)
- Re: Meet NANOG's New Executive Director! N91 Agenda is LIVE! + More Job Snijders via NANOG (May 16)
Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
  - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? jim deleskie (May 17)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 17)
  - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John Levine (May 17)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John R. Levine (May 17)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 17)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 17)
  - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Jon Lewis (May 17)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Mark Tinka (May 17)
  - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Joe via NANOG (May 17)
  - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Saku Ytti (May 17)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Mark Tinka (May 18)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 18)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Saku Ytti (May 18)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Ray Bellis (May 18)
Packet loss and latency between Akamai and NTT in Miami Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (May 17)
- Re: Packet loss and latency between Akamai and NTT in Miami Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG (May 17)
- Re: Packet loss and latency between Akamai and NTT in Miami Aaron Atac via NANOG (May 17)

Previous period