Bugtraq mailing list archives

RE: Insufficient Authentication vulnerability in Asus notebook


From: Jim Harrison <Jim () isatools org>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 09:10:15 -0700

The difference here is that renaming the admin also offers a some mitigation against local (e.g., non-networked) 
attacks for when the same person that can't be bothered to lock their session is rewarded with the latest d1psh1t virus 
when they download their porn-mule update. Installing the OS on something other than C: and renaming the admin account 
(regardless of the password) thwarts (sound of water dripping) most common local-attack methods. Simple and effective.

IOW:
1. no, this is not a "vulnerability in software", but build process failure by the OEM. As others have pointed out, 
this is frequently done to allow "ease of recovery" for the user.
2. there is no expectation (sadly) that OEM will perform any sort of security configuration on their products; 
typically, this is what "Bob's Security Suite" is intended to accomplish (I know...)
3. anyone leaving their session unlocked when they're removed from it for any length of time is a fuul (IMHO). It takes 
barely more than 0 seconds to hit <WIN>-L as you move away from the keyboard. ..of course, this habit may be offset by 
a 4-character password policy...


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Wilson [mailto:mwilson () amedisys com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 1:14 PM
To: 'Susan Bradley'; my.security.lists () gmail com
Cc: MustLive; bugtraq () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: Insufficient Authentication vulnerability in Asus notebook

A better option is to set a strong password and set a local policy that the local admin account cannot be accessed over 
the network.  I'm a big advocate of that in all environments and prevents the need for renaming the account to prevent 
automated attacks.

Thanks,
_________________________
Mike Wilson




-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Bradley [mailto:sbradcpa () pacbell net]
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:39 PM
To: my.security.lists () gmail com
Cc: MustLive; bugtraq () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Insufficient Authentication vulnerability in Asus notebook

We're talking XP Home here, right?  A admin account without a password
cannot be access remotely over the internet, so if you have physical
access at all times of that Asus netbook it's arguably more secure in
some circumstances.

nameless wrote:
Susan Bradley wrote:

3.  For XPs it's kinda handy to have a blank admin password when you
sometimes come in on a network and need to get to that particular
machine and you didn't set it up, otherwise you have to use the Admin
password boot disk trick and reset the password to blank.


You should only do the above recommendation, if you like to have your
boxes owned.

You should not have any administrative accounts named "Administrator"
and _all_ administrative accounts should have a _STRONG_ password
associated with them.

No exceptions.

Password safes are available at no charge.  If you somehow forget your
password, you can always reset it via AD or resetting the SAM.




*** NOTICE--The attached communication contains privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended 
recipient, DO NOT read, copy, or disseminate this communication. Non-intended recipients are hereby placed on notice 
that any unauthorized disclosure, duplication, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of 
these materials is expressly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this 
information in its entirety and contact the Amedisys Privacy Hotline at 1-866-518-6684. Also, please immediately notify 
the sender via e-mail that you have received this communication in error. ***


Current thread: