Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows
From: rmk115 () mailandnews com
Date: 21 Sep 2007 18:59:42 -0000
I must concur with Gadi. "0day" does not apply. How the vulnerability comes to light does matter. So far, all that has been exposed is "a vulnerability exists." If a PDF which exploits the vulnerability had circulated, then "0day" would apply. Active exploitation is the defining characteristic of "0day". Otherwise all vulnerabilities would be "0day" vulnerabilities. The term would be meaningless.
Current thread:
- RE: defining 0day, (continued)
- RE: defining 0day Marvin Simkin (Sep 28)
- Re: defining 0day Chad Perrin (Sep 28)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Steve Shockley (Sep 25)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Iggy E (Sep 25)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Aditya K Sood (Sep 20)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows pdp (architect) (Sep 20)
- Message not available
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows pdp (architect) (Sep 21)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows pdp (architect) (Sep 20)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Kevin Finisterre (lists) (Sep 21)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Aaron Collins (Sep 21)
- Re: Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Lamont Granquist (Sep 24)