Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows
From: "Gregory Rubin" <grrubin () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:47:47 -0700
I cannot reproduce this. mIRC: 6.2 Outlook 2007 (fully patched) Upon clicking the link, I get the following error message (from outlook): "The command line argument is not valid. Verify the switch you are using." Greg On 3 Oct 2007 16:06:29 -0000, jinc4fareijj () hotmail com <jinc4fareijj () hotmail com> wrote:
Yipiya Ypipiya yah yeah. Here is a 0day! hurra mIRC pwns your Windozes! (ref. pdp) send this to a user and make him double click on it (masquerade it with pink fore/background color and say 'free pr0n click here ->' it works all the time! damned perverts): mailto:%xx../../../../../../../../../../../windows/system32/calc.exe".bat Now the question is, should we say *0day* for a bug in a core element that is WELL KNOWN by everyone (reported months ago), and will be patched, or should we try to get credits for finding a *vector* as pdp did with the supposed *acrobat reader pdf bug* ? Fame kills bugs.
Current thread:
- 0day: mIRC pwns Windows jinc4fareijj (Oct 03)
- Re: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows Gavin Hanover (Oct 03)
- Re[2]: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows 3APA3A (Oct 04)
- Re: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows Greg Rubin (Oct 04)
- Re: Re[2]: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows Gavin Hanover (Oct 04)
- Re[2]: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows 3APA3A (Oct 04)
- Re: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows Gregory Rubin (Oct 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows Fred Elliot (Oct 04)
- Re: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows Gavin Hanover (Oct 03)