Bugtraq mailing list archives
RE: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks
From: "Pete Simpson" <Pete.Simpson () clearswift com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:25:06 +0100
Defence in depth is in question? After more than 20 years in compsec, the fallacy of the argument that defence in depth is dead is ironic. D.I.D. means that if defence A fails, B comes in. If B fails C comes in then D. etc. Though pdp is a very inventive youngster, it takes a few grey hairs to master security. Or perhaps we in the 'old scool' are deluded. Rgds Pete CUSTOMER TESTIMONIAL OF THE WEEK ---------------------------------------------------------------- Claudely Penchiari, IT Manager, Comgas: "We selected MIMEsweeper because of its policy-based content security, advanced threat and remote management and its ability to integrate with virtually any third-party anti-virus tool" ---------------------------------------------------------------- Clearswift monitors, controls and protects all its messaging traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy using Clearswift products. Find out more about Clearswift, its solutions and services at http://www.clearswift.com This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of Clearswift. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Clearswift by emailing support () clearswift com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. Clearswift accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the Clearswift domain. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses.
Current thread:
- RE: Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks, (continued)
- RE: Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks Thor (Hammer of God) (Oct 10)
- RE: Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks M. Burnett (Oct 11)
- Re: Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks pdp (architect) (Oct 11)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks gboyce (Oct 11)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks pdp (architect) (Oct 11)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks gjgowey (Oct 11)
- RE: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks Paul Melson (Oct 11)
- RE: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks Alex Everett (Oct 15)
- RE: Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks Jim Harrison (Oct 11)
- Re: Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks hvdkooij (Oct 12)
- Message not available
- RE: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks Pete Simpson (Oct 12)
- RE: Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks Thor (Hammer of God) (Oct 10)
- RE: Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks Thor (Hammer of God) (Oct 12)
- Re: Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks pdp (architect) (Oct 15)
- Message not available
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks pdp (architect) (Oct 15)