Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
From: "Pukhraj Singh" <pukhraj.singh () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:07:26 +0530
And you tell me how many of these variants you will actually find in the wild. Won't be a significant number I bet. Cheers! Pukhraj On 9/27/06, avivra <avivra () gmail com> wrote:
Hi, > i.e. I can't afford to buy "specialized" security tools/devices for > "speclialized" attacks unless my company relies heavily on web/content > services. So, you will buy "specialized" security tools like firewall or Anti-Virus, but not web content filtering tool? > In our company, we established a information-sharing > network with other security companies. So the real-time exploit-facing > signatures were then subjected to live traffic, honeypots and countless > variants; They seemed to work out pretty well. I would like to see how your real-time signatures get updated with the randomization implemented in the new VML metasploit module. Your "countless" exploit variants will become really innumerable. The problem is that the signatures are written for the exploit, and not for the vulnerability. -- Aviv.
Current thread:
- VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures avivra (Sep 26)
- Re: VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures Pukhraj Singh (Sep 26)
- RE: VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures Aviv Raff (Sep 26)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures Pukhraj Singh (Sep 28)
- RE: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures avivra (Sep 28)
- Message not available
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures SanjayR (Sep 29)
- RE: VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures Aviv Raff (Sep 26)
- Re: VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures Pukhraj Singh (Sep 26)