Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability
From: jrh57 () maine rr com
Date: 17 May 2006 16:22:49 -0000
Chris, You may be correct that SYN flood protection is somehow being triggered, although Sanjay says he has SYNdefender disabled. However, it should be possible to configure the FW to allow scanning through without triggering this behavior. We have done it a few times with ours and (while we have seen increased FW CPU utilization) never seen this sort of differing results. IMHO its not a *feature* if the FW responds differently at different times to the same stimulus unless you have it configured to do so ... now *That* could be cool ... #enable if <define your stimulus here> respond with random packet #done Later, Jim
Current thread:
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability, (continued)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability Pawel Worach (May 16)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability sanjay naik (May 16)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability Bojan Zdrnja (May 17)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability Jim Clausing (May 22)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability Erick Mechler (May 18)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability Bojan Zdrnja (May 22)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability sanjay naik (May 16)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability Pawel Worach (May 16)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability sanjay naik (May 18)
- Re: Checkpoint SYN DoS Vulnerability Niranjan S Patil (May 24)