Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour.
From: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha <strange () nsk no-ip org>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 08:58:09 +0100
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:49:07PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
(*)Contrary to the FAQ entry you cited, it is sometimes useful to change the ownership of a symlink. Since the owner of a symlink can be detected by a program, there can exist programs which depend on it.Yes, indeed. As another example, Apache has an option to only follow symlinks if they belong to the right person.
If the target belongs to the right person, not the symlink itself. Regards, Luciano Rocha -- Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.
Current thread:
- Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour. David Malone (May 14)
- Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour. Nicolas Rachinsky (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour. Michael Wojcik (May 14)
- Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour. David Malone (May 14)
- Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour. Michael Shigorin (May 15)
- Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour. Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha (May 15)
- Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour. Martin (May 15)
- Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour. David Malone (May 14)