Re: Is predictable spam filtering a vulnerability?

[krispykringle () gentoo org]

Very interesting proposition, but I can't think of any real advantage here. In the hypothetical scenario, could the 
attacker not simply send an email purportedly from the boss to begin with saying, ``please forward the secret plans to 
attacker () hijackeddomain com''? For that matter, isn't it likely that a recipient in such a poorly run system with 
such little regard for reading headers (and I don't delude myself that this is uncommon) would not notice if an 
attacker were to send an e-mail with a from address boss () company tld but a reply-to of hax0r () 
istealcreditcardnumbers com? In other words, the specific ``exploit'' here is not the spam filter so much as the 
ignorance of the victim. 

Anywho, it seems most decent spam filters have whitelisting; bigcheese () company com is unlikely to filter out 
servileMBA () company com, even if the e-mail does contain the key words. The spam filter is usually not applied to 
legitimate known-good e-mail addresses. 

Interesting discussion nonetheless. 

Dan

On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 01:26:28PM +0200, R Armiento wrote:
> During a recent email conversation with several participants, we discovered that the email service of one participant 
> silently dropped legitimate emails that happened to contain certain combinations of words common in spam. I believe 
> this sort of filter is common practice, and in fact even in place for some of my own email addresses.
>
> However, this experience made me think: isn't predictable spam filtering in general a vulnerability that could be 
> used as a hoax device? Since most users reply to an email citing the complete source email, including 
> filter-offending words, it should be possible to keep a reply, forward, or even a whole thread, under the radar of 
> specific recipients. If used in combination with forged replies from addresses predictably dropping emails, I think 
> this may be a dangerous tool for social engineering. 
>
> For example: attacker 'A' sends 'B' a social engineering request for "the secret plans" and says "if you are unsure, 
> forward my request to your boss and ask if this is okay". 'B' forwards the email to his boss 'C' and asks "Is this 
> okay?". However, 'C':s spam filter silently drops the email. 'A' forges a reply from 'C' saying: "Sure, no problem, 
> go ahead."
>
> Regards,
> R. Armiento