Bugtraq mailing list archives
RE: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate
From: bugtraq () anastrophe com
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:55:31 -0800
At 01:45 PM 1/23/2004, B. Kinney wrote:
I don't disagree with your opinion on the article - it was meant to be shock journalism. It's the only way they can get us to read anything about our political system. I still am of the nature that you don't go places you don't belong. If you need a more concrete example, think about the ladie's room. How old were you when you learned which door is NOT yours? Do you ever enter the wrong one with the intent of seeing something?! If you did, don't you think your friends and coworkers would find it inappropriate and disgraceful?
that wasn't the point of the followup. the point of the followup was that the original poster elided critical information in order to slant the message of the article to his particular political bias.
which is just as lame and dishonest as what the republicans did. Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com
Current thread:
- Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate, (continued)
- Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Kirk Spencer (Jan 24)
- Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Crispin Cowan (Jan 26)
- Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Daniel . Capo (Jan 24)
- Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Dinesh Nair (Jan 24)
- Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate ed (Jan 24)
- Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Kirk Spencer (Jan 24)
- Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Brian C. Lane (Jan 23)
- Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Kevin Reardon (Jan 24)
- Re: [work] Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate opticfiber (Jan 24)
- Re: [work] Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Jan 24)
- RE: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate B. Kinney (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- RE: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate bugtraq (Jan 24)
- Message not available