Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: W2K source "leaked"?

From: <telec () ureach com>
Date: 13 Feb 2004 14:47:43 -0000

In-Reply-To: <8B32EDC90D8F4E4AB40918883281874D273FEE () pivxwin2k1 secnet pivx com>

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1526829,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594

and 

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1526376,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594

Current thread:

W2K source "leaked"? Gadi Evron (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Zhenkai Liang (Feb 13)
- RE: [inbox] W2K source "leaked"? Curt Purdy (Feb 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? tlarholm (Feb 12)
  - Re: W2K source "leaked"? Víctor (Feb 13)
  - Re: W2K source "leaked"? Víctor (Feb 13)
    - Re: W2K source "leaked"? Byron Copeland (Feb 16)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? Drew Copley (Feb 13)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? telec (Feb 13)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? tlarholm (Feb 13)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? LordInfidel (Feb 16)
  - Re: W2K source "leaked"? Ho Chaw Ming (Feb 16)
    - Re: [work] Re: W2K source "leaked"? opticfiber (Feb 17)