Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re[2]: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?
From: 3APA3A <3APA3A () SECURITY NNOV RU>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:07:00 +0400
Dear Paul Szabo, --Monday, September 8, 2003, 4:26:24 AM, you wrote to 3APA3A () SECURITY NNOV RU:
-R 0 -s your_ad_can_be_here
PS> Your cure is worse than the disease: rate limiting allows a DoS PS> against the service, no limit allows a DoS against the whole PS> machine. -s limits number of processes invoked from same IP. You can additionally use -c to prevent distributed attack. It doesn't allow to DoS box and doesn't disable service for 10 minutes. -- ~/ZARAZA Ну а теперь, Уильям, хорошенько поразмыслите над данным письмом. (Твен)
Current thread:
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?, (continued)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Dan Stromberg (Sep 08)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Andres Kroonmaa (Sep 10)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Dan Stromberg (Sep 08)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Dagmar d'Surreal (Sep 08)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Mike Hoskins (Sep 09)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Mike Tancsa (Sep 08)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 10)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Greg A. Woods (Sep 10)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 10)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Dan Harkless (Sep 09)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Darren Pilgrim (Sep 09)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Paul Szabo (Sep 08)
- Re[2]: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? 3APA3A (Sep 08)
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Lucas Holt (Sep 08)
- Re: Re[2]: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Paul Szabo (Sep 08)
- Re[4]: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? 3APA3A (Sep 08)
- RE: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? bjornar.bjorgum.larsen (Sep 09)