Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Integer overflow in OpenBSD kernel
From: Jedi/Sector One <j () c9x org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:02:11 +0200
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:07:49AM -0400, Jason Houx wrote:
Question - how is upgrade to current a fix for this. Did you research 3.3 --stable et al ?
The fix has been committed to -STABLE branch. You don't need to upgrade to -current, moreover this is not a trivial operation since the format of executables files changed on x86 since 3.3. Just keep your current 3.3 version, sync your CVS tree with the OPENBSD_3_3 tag, recompile your kernel and reboot. If you're not familiar with the process of following the -STABLE branch, please have a look at : http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html http://www.uk.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html http://www.openbsd.org/cvsup.html Best regards, -- __ /*- Frank DENIS (Jedi/Sector One) <j () 42-Networks Com> -*\ __ \ '/ <a href="http://www.PureFTPd.Org/"> Secure FTP Server </a> \' / \/ <a href="http://www.Jedi.Claranet.Fr/"> Misc. free software </a> \/
Current thread:
- Integer overflow in OpenBSD kernel blexim (Sep 10)
- Re: Integer overflow in OpenBSD kernel Jason Houx (Sep 10)
- Re: Integer overflow in OpenBSD kernel Steve Shockley (Sep 10)
- Re: Integer overflow in OpenBSD kernel Jedi/Sector One (Sep 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Integer overflow in OpenBSD kernel blexim (Sep 10)
- Re: Integer overflow in OpenBSD kernel Jason Houx (Sep 10)