Bugtraq mailing list archives
RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack
From: white colin john <cjwhite1 () ehlnx13 ews uiuc edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:43:37 -0600 (CST)
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Thor Larholm wrote:
This post raises an interesting question. Is our goal to find new vulnerabilities and attack vectors to help secure users and critical infrastructures, or is our goal to ease exploitation of existing vulnerabilities?
If there's no proof-of-concept that shows current bugs can be combined into an exploit, is there any pressure on microsoft to patch the bugs?
Current thread:
- Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Liu Die Yu (Nov 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Thor Larholm (Nov 05)
- RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Steve Hillier (Nov 05)
- RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Benjamin Franz (Nov 05)
- RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack white colin john (Nov 05)
- RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Tyler Larson (Nov 06)
- Re: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Florian Weimer (Nov 07)
- Re: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Florian Weimer (Nov 05)
- Re: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Seth Arnold (Nov 05)
- Re: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Jelmer (Nov 06)
- RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Thor Larholm (Nov 05)
- RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Paul Szabo (Nov 05)
- RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Drew Copley (Nov 06)
- Re: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack http-equiv () excite com (Nov 06)
- Re: RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack Steven M. Christey (Nov 06)