Re: Unhackable network really unhackable?

[Niels Bakker <niels-bugtraq () bakker net>]

* bugjules () anarkey org (Julian Wynne) [Thu 27 Nov 2003, 19:14 CET]:
[..]
> Furthermore we would like to point out that InvisiLAN technology has no
> relation whatsoever with DHCP, for example InvisiLAN changes randomly
> not just the IP address but also the MAC address and the port numbers.

That rules out long-living TCP sessions.  Kind of defeats the purpose of
having a machine connected, doesn't it?


        -- Niels.

-- 
[Please reply to niels=bugtraq () bakker net instead.  I'm sick and tired
 of all the morons who misconfigure their mailers and send autoreplies
 back after anybody contributes something to a mailing list.]