Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Unfortunate interaction between EZMLM and MessageLabs virus scanning
From: Stephen Cope <mail () unsolicited kimihia org nz>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 16:14:51 +1200
Because the message is being *returned* as containing a virus, shouldn't it then use the address in the Return-Path header? It is a bounce message, not a *reply* (in which case it should use the Reply-To or From header, as per the RFC 2822 3.6.2). -- Stephen Cope - http://sdc.org.nz/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Unfortunate interaction between EZMLM and MessageLabs virus scanning Ben Laurie (May 08)
- Re: Unfortunate interaction between EZMLM and MessageLabs virus scanning Alun Jones (May 10)
- Re: Unfortunate interaction between EZMLM and MessageLabs virus scanning der Mouse (May 11)
- Re: Unfortunate interaction between EZMLM and MessageLabs virus scanning Stephen Cope (May 11)
- Re: Unfortunate interaction between EZMLM and MessageLabs virus scanning Alun Jones (May 10)