Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems.
From: Felix von Leitner <leitner () VIM ORG>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:51:09 +0100
Thus spake Mark.Andrews () NOMINUM COM (Mark.Andrews () NOMINUM COM):
IPv6 is another case though. Here you have mandatory PMTU for all protocols.This is a myth. It is quite possible to have a IPv6 implementation that does not require PMTU discovery. You just fragment all your traffic at the network MTU. If fact there are hooks in the BSD advansed API to allow you to do this on a per socket basis.
That is a myth, too. If chose not to to PMTU in IPv6, you have to limit your MTU to ~1200 byts (the exact value is in the RFC). So it's not the network MTU you are using.
DNS servers, for one, need to be able to disable PMTU on the replies.
? Felix
Current thread:
- ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. antirez (Jan 15)
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. Ofir Arkin (Jan 16)
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. antirez (Jan 16)
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. Peter Mathiasson (Jan 16)
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. Pavel Kankovsky (Jan 22)
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. antirez (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. Niels Provos (Jan 23)
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. antirez (Jan 23)
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. Mark . Andrews (Jan 24)
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. Felix von Leitner (Jan 25)
- Re: ICMP fragmentation required but DF set problems. Ofir Arkin (Jan 16)