Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw
From: Russ <Russ.Cooper () RC ON CA>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:10:12 -0500
To the best of my knowledge, Peter Guttman(sp?) has demonstrated for years now that there is no form of over-writing which makes any substantial difference to the ability to recover previously written data from a computer hard disk. My understanding of current "high security" standards wrt the re-use of disks which previously contained classified materials is that they only be re-used in similarly classified systems, or, are destroyed beyond any form of molecular reconstruction (e.g. melted). So to suggest that your perceived EFS flaw can be resolved by over-writing is naive. The only solution is to encrypt in memory or use some removable partition as the temp space. Anyone know if PGPdisk works differently than EFS does? Cheers, Russ - Surgeon General of TruSecure Corporation/NTBugtraq Editor
Current thread:
- BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Rickard Berglind (Jan 19)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Alexander Ivanchev (Jan 22)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Dan Kaminsky (Jan 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Russ (Jan 22)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Dan Kaminsky (Jan 23)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Timothy J. Miller (Jan 23)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Ryan Russell (Jan 23)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Jeremy Epstein (Jan 23)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Attonbitus Deus (Jan 23)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Dan Kaminsky (Jan 24)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Attonbitus Deus (Jan 25)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Kirk Corey (Jan 25)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Attonbitus Deus (Jan 25)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Dan Kaminsky (Jan 23)
- Re: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw Alexander Ivanchev (Jan 22)