Bugtraq mailing list archives
the morning after: VLAN Security
From: llynch () JORSM COM (llynch () JORSM COM)
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 03:27:13 -0000
The following is a stereo (2 Mikes) message [Mike <A
HREF="mailto:S=strange () cultural com">S=strange () cultural com< /A> -
Mike <A
HREF="mailto:F=frantzen () expert cc purdue edu">F=">F=frantzen@exp ert.cc.purdue.edu</A>]....
[Mike F:] I tested this feature on a 2924 Enterprise switch with a
Cisco 2514
(IOS 12.0 IP Enterprise feature set) recently, and it
appears indeed
to provide protection against directly writing to the MAC
of the target.
Pretty good for having blading on the brain... If I recall correctly, 2514's are unable to support Trunking. So it was a Cisco 45xx with FastEthernet card, but you already knew that. Just trying to confuse us, once again, I see... -LLL
To further confuse the reader, I must point out that the
802.10 frame spec
(for use on the trunk line) includes a boolean flag for
fragmented ether
frames. Cisco's documentation claims to ignore the
fragmentation field...
I'm going roller blading now :) ..... [Mike S]: And there you have it. -MS
Current thread:
- VLAN Security bugtraq () SIS ALPHAWEST COM AU (Sep 01)
- Re: VLAN Security Tilman Schmidt (Sep 02)
- Re: VLAN Security Basil V. Dolmatov (Sep 03)
- Re: VLAN Security Stefan Stefanov (Sep 03)
- Re: VLAN Security Lisa Napier (Sep 08)
- Internet Gambling Exploit Gary McGraw (Sep 03)
- Re: VLAN Security Strange (Sep 03)
- the morning after: VLAN Security llynch () JORSM COM (Sep 07)
- Re: VLAN Security Jason Lutz (Sep 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: VLAN Security David Taylor (Sep 07)
- Re: VLAN Security Roche-Kelly, Edmund B. (Sep 08)
- Re: VLAN Security LEPAGE, YVES (Sep 08)