Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Local DoS on network by unpriviledged user using setsockopt()
From: lamontg () RAVEN GENOME WASHINGTON EDU (Lamont Granquist)
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 15:07:17 -0700
The following do *not* appear to be vulnerable: Solaris 2.7 HP-UX 11.0 Digital Unix 4.0D IRIX 5.3, 6.4 On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, John N Dvorak wrote:
BSDI 2.1 BSDI 3.1 BSDI 4.0 BSDI 4.0.1 Cobalt Linux (MIPS) - RedHat based All vulnerable. I am testing on other Linux platforms, but I presume all BSD and Linux-based systems are affected. I have no resources to test this on Solaris, AIX, HP and System-V based systems. I would venture a guess that MacOS X may be vulnerable since I am fairly sure that most of the socket code is lifted directly from BSD. J
-- Lamont Granquist lamontg () genome washington edu Dept. of Molecular Biotechnology (206)616-5735 fax: (206)685-7344 Box 352145 / University of Washington / Seattle, WA 98195 PGP pubkey: finger lamontg () raven genome washington edu | pgp -fka
Current thread:
- Local DoS on network by unpriviledged user using setsockopt() Sven Berkvens (Sep 01)
- Re: Local DoS on network by unpriviledged user using setsockopt() John N Dvorak (Sep 03)
- Re: Local DoS on network by unpriviledged user using setsockopt() John N Dvorak (Sep 03)
- Re: Local DoS on network by unpriviledged user using setsockopt() Lamont Granquist (Sep 08)
- Re: Local DoS on network by unpriviledged user using setsockopt() FreeBSD -- The Power to Serve (Sep 03)
- another xploit for netscape 4.6 Narr0w (Sep 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Local DoS on network by unpriviledged user using setsockopt() John N Dvorak (Sep 08)
- Re: Local DoS on network by unpriviledged user using setsockopt() Dylan Griffiths (Sep 08)