Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: SMTP server account probing
From: alan () LXORGUK UKUU ORG UK (Alan Cox)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:45:46 +0000
Maybe what's needed is a new ioctl on a socket, so you can do this: if (vrfy_cnt > 25) { ioctl(net_socket,SO_NOSENDFIN); clkose(net_socket); }
How about adding a firewall rule for the site concerned ? Thats programatically similar and has the advantage they wont be back until you get bored enough to remove the block
Current thread:
- SMTP server account probing Brett Glass (Mar 08)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Frank Miller (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing John E. Martin (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Brett Glass (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Nick Andrew (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Brian Behlendorf (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Valdis.Kletnieks () VT EDU (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Scott Fendley (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Alexander Bochmann (Mar 10)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Alan Cox (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Brett Glass (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Ryan Permeh (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing Keith Woodworth (Mar 09)
- Linux Blind TCP Spoofing Security Research Labs (Mar 09)
- Re: Linux Blind TCP Spoofing John D. Hardin (Mar 09)
- Winfreeze.c for Solaris ... Max Schubert (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing GvS (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing David Gale (Mar 09)
- Re: SMTP server account probing James Lick (Mar 09)
- Administrivia Aleph One (Mar 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SMTP server account probing Stefan Monnier (Mar 09)