Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof
From: many () ENSI NET (Mariusz Marcinkiewicz)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 02:03:54 +0100
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Don Lewis wrote:
... or are there systems that give group kmem write privileges? If so, I'd say that's a security hole.
Yes, you are right... but... I saw that hole after installing new linx and checked it's security. First I was suprised but not for a long time. In a few mins I noticed all linux versions are chown .kmem; chmod g+s lsof... on linux /dev/kmem is +w for gid kmem, on bsd too (probably, I didn't checked that), so... all of std. distributions are vuln. without ONE! the slackware, IMHO, it's the most secure distribution [ :))) i know: slackware doesn't has lsof;))) but by tahat way that distr. is secure ;P ] Cheers -- Mariusz Marcinkiewicz [Security Specialist] [many () ensi net] European Network Security Institute [http://www.ensi.net]
Current thread:
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Don Lewis (Feb 18)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Vic Abell (Feb 18)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Mariusz Marcinkiewicz (Feb 18)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Robert Watson (Feb 19)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Lee Brotzman (Feb 22)
- NcFTPd remote buffer overflow Julien Nadeau (Feb 23)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Alan Cox (Feb 19)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Alex Shnitman (Feb 20)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Wichert Akkerman (Feb 21)
- Possible DOS attack in the .nu domain service Shane Wegner (Feb 20)
- Severe Security Hole in ARCserve NT agents (fwd) Weld Pond (Feb 21)
- Administrivia Aleph One (Feb 22)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Robert Watson (Feb 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Friedrichs, Oliver (Feb 18)