Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: FW-1 DOS attack: PART II
From: lance () SPITZNER NET (Spitzner, Lance)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 23:32:19 -0500
On 31 Jul 1999, James E McWilliams wrote:
Good write up on the page. I have a wild one for you is in the INSPECT code do you think this problem can be solved? I am going to start looking at it tonight and see what I can get going with it. One more question I had is and I only heard back from one person saying they filled up the connections on a LINUX proxy based FW in the same matter with NMAP. I was wondering if this would work on other FW's?
Excellent question about the use of Inspect, I do not know. I talked to several hardcore guru's it may be possible. If you come up with anything, let us know! Meanwhile, I'll be taking a stab at it myself :) As for other FW's I don't know. You would have to learn how their connections table works.
You might be on to something big...
Bigger then I thought. I hope this doesn't blow up in my face :) Lance http://www.enteract.com/~lspitz
Current thread:
- Re: FW-1 DOS attack: PART II Spitzner, Lance (Jul 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FW-1 DOS attack: PART II Ramon Krikken (Aug 01)
- Re: FW-1 DOS attack: PART II Spitzner, Lance (Aug 01)
- Re: FW-1 DOS attack: PART II Steve Birnbaum (Aug 03)
- IE5 ActiveX security bug Sami Kuhmonen (Aug 01)
- Re: IE5 ActiveX security bug Adam H. Pendleton (Aug 03)
- Re: IE5 ActiveX security bug Hakeem Shittu (Aug 03)
- Fwd: [SECURITY] New version of samba released Chris Ruvolo (Aug 01)
- midnight commander vulnerability(?) (fwd) coda (Aug 01)
- Re: FW-1 DOS attack: PART II Spitzner, Lance (Aug 01)
- Re: FW-1 DOS attack: PART II Sean Boyle (Aug 02)
- Re: FW-1 DOS attack: PART II Darren Reed (Aug 03)
(Thread continues...)