Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: ICQ Webserver bug
From: jreyes () CEIS ISPJAE EDU CU (José Reyes Cedeño)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 08:45:48 -0400
Well, my box was win 98, and the remote box I tested it against was win 95. Didn't have anyone running NT handy to test against. However, another person I corresponded with who was testing this did get it to drop a 95 box, but not every time. Did it every time for me; but there's apparently other factors that contribute as well. -- Ron Jarrell VA Tech Computing Center
I try to test this on my NT box ( NT server 4.00.1381, Sevice pack 3 ) and I could not reproduce the error. I've used ICQ Version 99a Beta v.2.13 Build 1700. It would be beneficial if Ron Jarrell or Jan Vogelgesang, explained the procedure that they carried out to arrive to the error detailedly. Best regards, Jose.
Current thread:
- Re: ICQ Webserver bug Ronald A. Jarrell (Apr 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ICQ Webserver bug José Reyes Cedeño (Apr 08)
- Re: ICQ Webserver bug Kaven Rousseau (Apr 08)
- Re: ICQ Webserver bug Frank Dekervel (Apr 10)
- ARP problem in Windows9X/NT Joel Jacobson (Apr 12)
- Re: ARP problem in Windows9X/NT gandalf () POBOX COM (Apr 12)
- Re: ARP problem in Windows9X/NT kay (Apr 13)
- Re: ARP problem in Windows9X/NT kay (Apr 13)
- Serious security holes in web anonimyzing services Patrick Oonk (Apr 13)
- Re: Serious security holes in web anonimyzing services Jeremey Barrett (Apr 13)
- Re: ARP problem in Windows9X/NT route () RESENTMENT INFONEXUS COM (Apr 13)
- Re: ARP problem in Windows9X/NT gandalf () POBOX COM (Apr 13)