Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Comparison of THC-SCAN v2.0 with Sandstorm PhoneSweep 1.02
From: nimrood () DXM DARKRIDGE COM (nimrood)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 16:55:54 -0500
http://www.hammer.com/ Hammer Technologies, which was a group of people that left my parent company (at the time Boston Technology, Inc.) to start Hammer, has a product that puts both THC-SCAN and PhoneSweep to shame. When that group of people left Boston Technology, their product's main focus was to 'hammer' trunks attached to the BTI voicemail systems. Making sure those trunks were successfully answered with the proper voice prompts. Since then, they've developed their system to do much, much more... including a programming language derived off Visual Basic with many telephony functions. It's a custom built machine running Windows NT 4.0. A configuration pricing can range from a simple box at a couple thousand dollars to something like we use here at our office, which cost over $120,000US (our box has several T1 interface cards for massive scanning and speech recognition) Just from what I read in the comparison post, IMHO, Hammer is far superior to either product. Anyway, that's my two cents. -nimrood
Current thread:
- Re: Comparison of THC-SCAN v2.0 with Sandstorm PhoneSweep 1.02 nimrood (Dec 29)
- Re: Comparison of THC-SCAN v2.0 with Sandstorm PhoneSweep 1.02 Josh Bailey (Dec 30)
- SecureXpert Labs Advisory [SX-98.12.30-01] SecureXpert DIRECT Sender (Dec 30)
- nmap kills hylafax too. David Gale (Dec 30)
- Oracle8 TNSLSNR DoS [SUMMARY] Aleph One (Dec 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comparison of THC-SCAN v2.0 with Sandstorm PhoneSweep 1.02 Ryan Russell (Dec 29)
- Re: Comparison of THC-SCAN v2.0 with Sandstorm PhoneSweep 1.02 der Mouse (Dec 29)