Bugtraq mailing list archives
SECURITY: metamail update (fwd)
From: raymond () THRIJSWIJK NL (Raymond Dijkxhoorn)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 01:19:05 +0200
Hi! The fix for the metamail on RedHat was not properly builded, see below, fix is also online allready... Bye, Raymond Dijkxhoorn Technische Hogeschool Rijswijk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The metamail fix announced yesterday was not built properly. Please upgrade to metamail-2.7-7.2 as soon as possible. Thanks to Andrey V. Savochkin for noticing this, and pointing it out. Erik Red Hat 4.2 - ------------- i386: rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.2/i386/metamail-2.7-7.2.i386.rpm alpha: rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.2/alpha/metamail-2.7-7.2.alpha.rpm SPARC: rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.2/sparc/metamail-2.7-7.2.sparc.rpm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNFH+Q6Ug6PHLopv5AQFefgP+JqM88NcG6w+2JNbxEUg7QQ2Zc2TyUV6w GvB39YcKyWS35+fZLE1vX+ropmzdqYtWDq1vkoQPNY466XUycwuvcz6+4yHZUtRH J6dsHo0vg9svToPNgefE7c1nwvy0y6ZRwgKwyI12OjUptUXKEb7VnfsGd5Q/PdyF vgKY6vaPeTE= =/dkb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in open()? Aleph One (Oct 23)
- a bug in IRIX open() as well [was Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in Mike Kienenberger (Oct 24)
- Vulnerability in metamail Alan Cox (Oct 24)
- Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in open()? Theo de Raadt (Oct 24)
- Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in open()? Theo de Raadt (Oct 24)
- Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in open()? Mark E. Mallett (Oct 24)
- Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in open()? Tim Newsham (Oct 25)
- Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in open()? Mark E. Mallett (Oct 25)
- SECURITY: metamail update (fwd) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 25)
- Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in open()? Tim Newsham (Oct 25)